At least 10,000 people affected by Post Office IT scandal as bosses ‘maintained fiction’ Horizon data was accurate, report says – live | Politics


At least 10,000 people affected by Post Office IT scandal, inquiry report says

This is what Sir Wyn Williams, the inquiry chair, says in his report about the human impact of the Post Office Horizon IT scandal.

It is almost impossible to ascertain, with any degree of accuracy, the number of persons who have suffered as a result of the misplaced reliance upon data produced by Horizon. I can say, however, with a degree of confidence that there are currently about 10,000 eligible claimants in the schemes providing financial redress and that number is likely to rise at least by hundreds, if not more, over the coming months.

The scale of the suffering endured by those claimants is extremely wide-ranging. At one end of the spectrum, there are claimants who were held liable for small amounts of money allegedly lost to the Post Office – perhaps tens or hundreds of pounds. At the other end of the spectrum, there are claimants who were wrongly convicted and imprisoned, and/or became seriously ill, and/or were declared bankrupt. There are claimants who represent persons who have died. Some of the deceased persons died of natural causes before their convictions were quashed; some have died more recently before their claims for financial redress were determined fully; some are said to have been driven to despair and suicide.

Key events

Williams says compensation should also be available to family members affected by Post Office scandal

Williams ended by saying that, when he started work on the inquiry, he was not familiar with the concept of restorative justice.

But, as the inquiry went on, calls for restorative justice became “louder and louder”, he said. He said the Post Office and Fujitsu embraced the concept “with what I might describe as varying degrees of enthusiasm”. He said he thought they would at least consider this approach. But nothing has happened. He urged the government to get involved.

He also said he thought compensation should be paid “to family members who have suffered serious adverse consequences as a result of the treatment meted out to their loved ones”.




Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please disable your adblocker or whitelist this site!